- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 13:39:59 +0100
- To: Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>, Webmaster <webreq@w3.org>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Scott Simmons <ssimmons@opengeospatial.org>, Simon Cox <simon.cox@csiro.au>, "Little, Chris" <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>, "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
I love our archiving system. Thanks Denis. Cheers Phil. On 12/07/2016 12:33, Denis Ah-Kang wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Thanks for updating the document. It's now published on /TR > and Xueyuan will soon issue the CfE. > FYI, the document was marked as 'Retired' from a previous request [1]. > I removed that bit since it's being developed again. > > Denis > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Team/w3t-archive/2009Apr/0370.html > > On 07/12/2016 01:46 PM, Phil Archer wrote: >> Thanks Denis, >> >> I'm not surprised but I was just following orders, honestly... >> >> Anyway, the WD is now installed (again) at >> https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-owl-time-20160712/ and passes PubRules, >> modulo the issues highlighted yesterday wrt to: >> >> - joint copyright with OGC; >> - a namespace checker that after all these years still has problems with >> RDF ;-) >> >> Ralph's approval is in Team space at >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Team/w3t-comm/2016Jul/0172.html >> >> Cheers >> >> Phil >> >> On 12/07/2016 07:22, Denis Ah-Kang wrote: >>> Hi Phil, >>> >>> I assume the document you want to publish is >>> https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-owl-time-20160712/. >>> >>> If the document has a previous version, it can't be a FPWD. You must >>> update it as a WD. IPP will then detect the previous version was >>> published under a different WG and trigger a CfE. >>> >>> Denis >>> >>> >>> On 07/11/2016 08:16 PM, Phil Archer wrote: >>>> Hi Denis, >>>> >>>> This is a publication request for the 'FPWD' of the Time Ontology in >>>> OWL. I am confident that Ralph will approve the transition request [1] >>>> that contains a lot of the info you need. However, this is an unusual >>>> one for several reasons. >>>> >>>> Firstly, as you're used to by now, the copyright notice and logos are >>>> customised to account for this also being an OGC publication. Text used >>>> is exactly the same as /TR/vocab-ssn/ for example. >>>> >>>> What's doubly unusual is that this really is an FPWD - but one that has >>>> a previous version. This is because the previous version was published >>>> in 2006 by a different WG. We need to go through the FPWD process to >>>> trigger the IPR claims etc. I don't want to remove the previous version >>>> links (as PubRules screams at me to do of course) because that old link >>>> is still relevant. >>>> >>>> I see from https://www.w3.org/TR/tr-date-all#tr_2006 that the original >>>> one is retired - which is news to me. People have been using that spec >>>> since it was first published. Not sure why it's flagged as retired. It >>>> shouldn't be AFAIAC. >>>> >>>> The draft should appear at >>>> https://www.w3.org/TR/#tr_Data_on_the_Web >>>> >>>> PubRules also doesn't like DOIs. Several of the references have DOIs >>>> rather than proper URIs, which lead to redirects, but that's what DOIs >>>> are for. >>>> >>>> There is a reference, not a link, to >>>> http://www.daml.org/2003/02/fips55/id.owl#c049, that the namespace >>>> checker doesn't like as it doesn't dereference but it is correct. >>>> >>>> Hope this is all OK. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> Phil. >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2016JulSep/0013.html >>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2016 12:39:04 UTC