Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements

Dear editors,

I haven't had much response to my question so far. So as an aid, here is a
list of the open issues marked in the current UCR draft:

ISSUE-20 <> (SSN)
ISSUE-23 <> (Best Practices)
ISSUE-24 <> (SSN)
ISSUE-26 <> (Time)
ISSUE-28 <> (Best Practices)

Wouldn't it be nice if we can resolve these issues before the next and
final PWD of the UCR document this month?


2016-06-22 13:12 GMT+02:00 Frans Knibbe <>:

> Dear editors of the BP/Time/SSN/Coverage deliverable,
> In preparation of a next public working draft of the UCR document I would
> like to ask you for feedback on the requirements for your deliverable as
> specified in the UCR document. Section 6
> <>
> list requirements grouped by deliverable. By now you will have stared long
> & hard at those requirements, and perhaps you concluded that some or not
> clear yet, or that something else is wrong. Perhaps requirements or even
> important use cases are missing?
> While we are working on a new batch of publications before TPAC, it would
> be nice if the requirements in the UCR document are (among) the ones you
> are actually working with. I think the public we are writing for deserves
> that coherence. I presume your deliverables will link back to the UCR
> document and explain how requirements are met or why requirements are not
> met. So if you think any changes are required in the UCR document resulting
> from your work on your deliverable, please inform me.
> Thanks,
> Frans

Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2016 13:01:05 UTC