Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements

Dear fellow editors,

I am happy to report that the current draft of the UC&R is now free of
those pesky red notifications of unresolved issues. Many thanks for your
help with that! However, the tracker still lists two things that need to be

Issue-29 <> is about a
possible new requirement for the BP deliverable. Could the BP team please
have a look?

Action-111 <> is about
possibly adding use cases and requirements that were used for the existing
SSN vocabulary. Could the SSN team please have a look and make a decision?

Thanks in advance,

On 22 June 2016 at 13:12, Frans Knibbe <> wrote:

> Dear editors of the BP/Time/SSN/Coverage deliverable,
> In preparation of a next public working draft of the UCR document I would
> like to ask you for feedback on the requirements for your deliverable as
> specified in the UCR document. Section 6
> <>
> list requirements grouped by deliverable. By now you will have stared long
> & hard at those requirements, and perhaps you concluded that some or not
> clear yet, or that something else is wrong. Perhaps requirements or even
> important use cases are missing?
> While we are working on a new batch of publications before TPAC, it would
> be nice if the requirements in the UCR document are (among) the ones you
> are actually working with. I think the public we are writing for deserves
> that coherence. I presume your deliverables will link back to the UCR
> document and explain how requirements are met or why requirements are not
> met. So if you think any changes are required in the UCR document resulting
> from your work on your deliverable, please inform me.
> Thanks,
> Frans

Received on Thursday, 14 July 2016 13:31:20 UTC