W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > July 2016

Re: Proposal for SSN core

From: Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 12:52:07 +0000
To: "janowicz@ucsb.edu" <janowicz@ucsb.edu>, Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
CC: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, "danh.lephuoc@deri.org" <danh.lephuoc@deri.org>
Message-ID: <D3A33B86.58DA6%u5127790@anu.edu.au>
Hi Krzysztof,

Yes, when Simon and I tried to do updates in Webprotege last week, we got really frustrated with the way it is dealing with URIs. I think we better move to Github.

Cheers,
Armin

From: Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu<mailto:janowicz@ucsb.edu>>
Reply-To: "janowicz@ucsb.edu<mailto:janowicz@ucsb.edu>" <janowicz@ucsb.edu<mailto:janowicz@ucsb.edu>>
Date: Tuesday 5 July 2016 02:17
To: Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au<mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au>>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>>
Cc: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au<mailto:kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>>, "danh.lephuoc@deri.org<mailto:danh.lephuoc@deri.org>" <danh.lephuoc@deri.org<mailto:danh.lephuoc@deri.org>>
Subject: Re: Proposal for SSN core

Thanks Armin,

I am very happy to see that this is moving forward and that we seem to converge. That said, all of this is happening during the summer and the holidays (here in the US) so I will need some time to catch up. Of course, I am still very, very interested in the core pattern and the SSN work as such.

Two notes before I dive into the details:

I added Actuators and called the core subsequently "Sensor and Actuator Core Ontology" aka "Sanda".

Can we somehow add observations back to the name?

<http://webprotege.stanford.edu/#Edit:projectId=32a4ea9e-4d06-4f92-8188-07fcd96f81a7>http://webprotege.stanford.edu/#Edit:projectId=32a4ea9e-4d06-4f92-8188-07fcd96f81a7

Maybe I am just getting too old, but IMHO doing this via shared github documents, the wiki, and email will allow more people to get involved and make their change(s) (requests). Protoege is a nice way for getting the ontology out there and for evolving a more or less stable version. For this early phase it is rather hindering.

Best,
Jano



On 06/27/2016 12:52 AM, Armin Haller wrote:
Hi,

I have made and uploaded a proposal for the SSN core ontology at:

<http://webprotege.stanford.edu/#Edit:projectId=32a4ea9e-4d06-4f92-8188-07fcd96f81a7>http://webprotege.stanford.edu/#Edit:projectId=32a4ea9e-4d06-4f92-8188-07fcd96f81a7

It is largely similar to what Krzysztof proposed on the Wiki: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SSN_core_modules

I added Actuators and called the core subsequently "Sensor and Actuator Core Ontology" aka "Sanda". I also added domain and range as annotation properties, please check if you agree, but as discussed there should not be any domain and range restrictions in the core.

Cheers,
Armin






--
Krzysztof Janowicz

Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara
4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060

Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu<mailto:jano@geog.ucsb.edu>
Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/
Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2016 12:52:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:23 UTC