Re: Proposal for SSN core

Thanks Armin,

I am very happy to see that this is moving forward and that we seem to 
converge. That said, all of this is happening during the summer and the 
holidays (here in the US) so I will need some time to catch up. Of 
course, I am still very, very interested in the core pattern and the SSN 
work as such.

Two notes before I dive into the details:

> I added Actuators and called the core subsequently “Sensor and 
> Actuator Core Ontology” aka “Sanda”.

Can we somehow add observations back to the name?

> http://webprotege.stanford.edu/#Edit:projectId=32a4ea9e-4d06-4f92-8188-07fcd96f81a7
>

Maybe I am just getting too old, but IMHO doing this via shared github 
documents, the wiki, and email will allow more people to get involved 
and make their change(s) (requests). Protoege is a nice way for getting 
the ontology out there and for evolving a more or less stable version. 
For this early phase it is rather hindering.

Best,
Jano



On 06/27/2016 12:52 AM, Armin Haller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have made and uploaded a proposal for the SSN core ontology at:
>
> http://webprotege.stanford.edu/#Edit:projectId=32a4ea9e-4d06-4f92-8188-07fcd96f81a7
>
> It is largely similar to what Krzysztof proposed on the Wiki: 
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SSN_core_modules
>
> I added Actuators and called the core subsequently “Sensor and 
> Actuator Core Ontology” aka “Sanda”. I also added domain and range as 
> annotation properties, please check if you agree, but as discussed 
> there should not be any domain and range restrictions in the core.
>
> Cheers,
> Armin
>


-- 
Krzysztof Janowicz

Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara
4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060

Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu
Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/
Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net