W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > July 2016

Re: Merge requirements for non-geographic reference systems?

From: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 14:36:08 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFVDz40NQX-hREbt24U7_N8Q4QHZqsNYCS_Q4GzqbB3jSmBWnQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Nobody has objected to the proposal, so I just merged the two requirements
to form the single requirement Independence on reference systems
<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#IndependenceOnReferenceSystems>
.

Regards,
Frans

2016-06-07 18:45 GMT+02:00 Little, Chris <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>:

> Hi Frans,
>
>
>
> Seems sensible to me. I cannot think of a reason to keep them separate.
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> *From:* Frans Knibbe [mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 06, 2016 11:39 AM
> *To:* SDW WG Public List
> *Subject:* Merge requirements for non-geographic reference systems?
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Going through open UCR issues, I noticed issue-32
> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/32>, which points out that
> two requirements are remarkably similar:
>
>
> http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#IndependenceOnReferenceSystems
>  and
> http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#NonGeographicReferenceSystem
>
>
>
> The first is a requirement for BP and SSN, the second for Coverages. Those
> different backgrounds may explain why the requirements are separate. But I
> see little reason to keep it that way. Does anyone object to merging the
> two requirements? That would result in one requirement with shared related
> deliverables and use cases.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Frans
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2016 12:36:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:23 UTC