Hi all In advance of the SDW call today, here is a brief summary of what we covered in the coverage sub-group call last week: Minutes here: https://www.w3.org/2016/04/06-sdwcov-minutes - preferred terminology for 'subsets' : let's go with 'extracts' in most cases - ANU working on an RDF representation of coverage data, similar in structure to CoverageJSON. Question of best way to represent the data itself - eg as a relatively dense 'microformat' within a literal? ANU also building a client application that will consume their data to make a useful demo/test - discussion of criteria to assess a potential solution to identifying and delivering coverage extracts. (I will draft something based on discussions so far, before next coverage meeting) Best regards BillReceived on Wednesday, 13 April 2016 11:46:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:20 UTC