W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > April 2016

summary of last coverage sub-group meeting

From: Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:45:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMTVsu=MS-t4Bug1Jz4uAb+3gs54awyig=QerjuSxmoaR6PVmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Hi all

In advance of the SDW call today, here is a brief summary of what we
covered in the coverage sub-group call last week:

Minutes here: https://www.w3.org/2016/04/06-sdwcov-minutes

- preferred terminology for 'subsets' : let's go with 'extracts' in most
cases
- ANU working on an RDF representation of coverage data, similar in
structure to CoverageJSON.  Question of best way to represent the data
itself - eg as a relatively dense 'microformat' within a literal?  ANU also
building a client application that will consume their data to make a useful
demo/test
- discussion of criteria to assess a potential solution to identifying and
delivering coverage extracts. (I will draft something based on discussions
so far, before next coverage meeting)

Best regards

Bill
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2016 11:46:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:20 UTC