- From: Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:45:54 +0100
- To: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2016 11:46:24 UTC
Hi all In advance of the SDW call today, here is a brief summary of what we covered in the coverage sub-group call last week: Minutes here: https://www.w3.org/2016/04/06-sdwcov-minutes - preferred terminology for 'subsets' : let's go with 'extracts' in most cases - ANU working on an RDF representation of coverage data, similar in structure to CoverageJSON. Question of best way to represent the data itself - eg as a relatively dense 'microformat' within a literal? ANU also building a client application that will consume their data to make a useful demo/test - discussion of criteria to assess a potential solution to identifying and delivering coverage extracts. (I will draft something based on discussions so far, before next coverage meeting) Best regards Bill
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2016 11:46:24 UTC