W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > April 2016

summary of last coverage sub-group meeting

From: Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:45:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMTVsu=MS-t4Bug1Jz4uAb+3gs54awyig=QerjuSxmoaR6PVmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Hi all

In advance of the SDW call today, here is a brief summary of what we
covered in the coverage sub-group call last week:

Minutes here: https://www.w3.org/2016/04/06-sdwcov-minutes

- preferred terminology for 'subsets' : let's go with 'extracts' in most
- ANU working on an RDF representation of coverage data, similar in
structure to CoverageJSON.  Question of best way to represent the data
itself - eg as a relatively dense 'microformat' within a literal?  ANU also
building a client application that will consume their data to make a useful
- discussion of criteria to assess a potential solution to identifying and
delivering coverage extracts. (I will draft something based on discussions
so far, before next coverage meeting)

Best regards

Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2016 11:46:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:20 UTC