Re: What makes a 'best' best practice?

agreed.

On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 at 11:57 Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> The summary looks good. It seems the BP document will be well thought out.
>
> I agree that the durability issue is worth discussing. We want to avoid to
> publish a document giving an overview of 'best practices in 2015', which
> may contain good practices for 2017 if one reads carefully enough, and
> gives an interesting insight into old school thinking in 2019, along with a
> fascinating collection of broken links. Would it be possible to have some
> kind of continued maintenance of the Best Practices after the SDWWG
> finishes its job?
>
> Greetings,
> Frans
>
>
> 2015-09-23 12:35 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi-
>>
>> Many thanks for the references to your favourite (technical)
>> documentation examples [1].
>>
>> I've summarised the key points [2] - there are some pretty clear things
>> that we need to do ... and some questions too (for example- about
>> publishing working examples and other resources that are as durable as the
>> W3C needs).
>>
>> Happy to discuss on the call today or via email. Please advise if
>> a) I have missed anything that you regard as a "must have"
>> b) there's anything that you see as a "don't do that"
>>
>> Regards, Jeremy
>>
>> [1]: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_Structure_Examples
>> [2]:
>> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_Structure_Examples#Summary_points
>>
>>
>
>