- From: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:57:36 +0200
- To: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
- Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFVDz42g5GMOXFxW42xYT+ps-JPrm3FE=bTjPaOVKtN3ed0cTA@mail.gmail.com>
Hello, The summary looks good. It seems the BP document will be well thought out. I agree that the durability issue is worth discussing. We want to avoid to publish a document giving an overview of 'best practices in 2015', which may contain good practices for 2017 if one reads carefully enough, and gives an interesting insight into old school thinking in 2019, along with a fascinating collection of broken links. Would it be possible to have some kind of continued maintenance of the Best Practices after the SDWWG finishes its job? Greetings, Frans 2015-09-23 12:35 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>: > Hi- > > Many thanks for the references to your favourite (technical) documentation > examples [1]. > > I've summarised the key points [2] - there are some pretty clear things > that we need to do ... and some questions too (for example- about > publishing working examples and other resources that are as durable as the > W3C needs). > > Happy to discuss on the call today or via email. Please advise if > a) I have missed anything that you regard as a "must have" > b) there's anything that you see as a "don't do that" > > Regards, Jeremy > > [1]: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_Structure_Examples > [2]: > https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_Structure_Examples#Summary_points >
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2015 10:58:05 UTC