Re: What makes a 'best' best practice?

Endurance/maintenance  came up early in the requirements phase. Lets ask phil what the w3c could do for us in this respect, and we should follow up with ogc too.
--Kerry


> On 23 Sep 2015, at 8:58 pm, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> agreed.
> 
>> On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 at 11:57 Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> The summary looks good. It seems the BP document will be well thought out.
>> 
>> I agree that the durability issue is worth discussing. We want to avoid to publish a document giving an overview of 'best practices in 2015', which may contain good practices for 2017 if one reads carefully enough, and gives an interesting insight into old school thinking in 2019, along with a fascinating collection of broken links. Would it be possible to have some kind of continued maintenance of the Best Practices after the SDWWG finishes its job?
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> Frans
>> 
>> 
>> 2015-09-23 12:35 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>:
>>> Hi-
>>> 
>>> Many thanks for the references to your favourite (technical) documentation examples [1].
>>> 
>>> I've summarised the key points [2] - there are some pretty clear things that we need to do ... and some questions too (for example- about publishing working examples and other resources that are as durable as the W3C needs).
>>> 
>>> Happy to discuss on the call today or via email. Please advise if 
>>> a) I have missed anything that you regard as a "must have"
>>> b) there's anything that you see as a "don't do that"
>>> 
>>> Regards, Jeremy
>>> 
>>> [1]: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_Structure_Examples
>>> [2]: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_Structure_Examples#Summary_points