W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > May 2015

Re: Quality metadata

From: Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 12:27:30 +0200
Message-ID: <CABTzy2QVm547vSXy_7N=aKQDED3R8T2BUkRvBXftog9_jQPppg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Hi Frans,

I would not merge them because the spatial metadata req seems to cover
spatial aspects of the data, whereas the quality metadata requirement
covers different aspects, such as the uncertainty of a measurement.

Cheers,
Alejandro

On 28 May 2015 at 19:01, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:

> Hello Alejandro,
>
> I think the Quality metadata requirement
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#Linkability> can
> be merged with the Spatial metadata
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SpatialMetadata>
> requirement. Spatial resolution is already mentioned there. If there are
> other spatial quality metadata we could add them there.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Greetings,
> Frans
>
> --
> Frans Knibbe
> Geodan
> President Kennedylaan 1
> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)
>
> T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
> www.geodan.nl
> disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
>
>


-- 
Alejandro Llaves

Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)

Artificial Intelligence Department

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Avda. Montepríncipe s/n

Boadilla del Monte, 28660 Madrid, Spain


http://www.oeg-upm.net/index.php/phd/325-allaves


allaves@fi.upm.es
Received on Friday, 29 May 2015 10:27:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:16 UTC