- From: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 13:12:47 +0200
- To: Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFVDz43WG6fOiEo57ww0OSaQaDTC=zK=sqBxW-9RYTJpPKsqVw@mail.gmail.com>
2015-05-29 12:27 GMT+02:00 Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es>: > Hi Frans, > > I would not merge them because the spatial metadata req seems to cover > spatial aspects of the data, whereas the quality metadata requirement > covers different aspects, such as the uncertainty of a measurement. > But if the quality metadata requirement is only about uncertainty of non-spatial measurements, doesn't it mean it is out of scope for our working group? Greetings, Frans > > Cheers, > Alejandro > > On 28 May 2015 at 19:01, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote: > >> Hello Alejandro, >> >> I think the Quality metadata requirement >> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#Linkability> can >> be merged with the Spatial metadata >> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SpatialMetadata> >> requirement. Spatial resolution is already mentioned there. If there are >> other spatial quality metadata we could add them there. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Greetings, >> Frans >> >> -- >> Frans Knibbe >> Geodan >> President Kennedylaan 1 >> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) >> >> T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 >> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl >> www.geodan.nl >> disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer> >> >> > > > -- > Alejandro Llaves > > Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) > > Artificial Intelligence Department > > Universidad Politécnica de Madrid > > Avda. Montepríncipe s/n > > Boadilla del Monte, 28660 Madrid, Spain > > > http://www.oeg-upm.net/index.php/phd/325-allaves > > > allaves@fi.upm.es > -- Frans Knibbe Geodan President Kennedylaan 1 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl www.geodan.nl disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
Received on Friday, 29 May 2015 11:13:18 UTC