RE: [use cases] Requirements as links


I don’t want to be a pain, but the way our requirements list is currently structured, I am really missing the link with use cases. It’s really hard to see if the req list is complete and also if all the reqs truly come from a use case.

Van: Alejandro Llaves []
Verzonden: woensdag 18 maart 2015 23:04
CC: SDW WG Public List
Onderwerp: Re: [use cases] Requirements as links

Thanks, Chaals. Yes, the CSV on the Web document is well structured and we are planning to do something similar for the requirements on the SDW Use Cases document.


2015-03-18 21:15 GMT+11:00 <<>>:
A little thing on best practice that I think we should do here, too...


-------- Beginning of forwarded message  --------
18.03.2015, 13:04, "<>" <<>>:

Yeah, I did this with the longdesc spec too -

It makes life a lot clearer all round.


18.03.2015, 06:27, "Manu Sporny" <<>>:
>  During the Credentials Community Group call today, Gregg Kellogg
>  provided a link to the CSV on the Web use cases document, which does
>  something that I think we should shamelessly embrace and extend.
>  Look at how they do requirements (search for "Requires:"):

>  Each use case links to a set of requirements that are published at the
>  end of the document:

>  Gregg said that doing so made it much easier to categorize and track the
>  technical requirements of the solution.
>  -- manu
>  --
>  Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
>  Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>  blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments

Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex<> - - - Find more at

-------- End of forwarded message --------

Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex<> - - - Find more at

Alejandro Llaves

Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)

Facultad de Informática

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Avda. Montepríncipe s/n

Boadilla del Monte, 28660 Madrid, Spain<>

During February and March 2015, I will be doing a research stay at CSIRO Canberra<> (Australia) working on semantic sensor networks.

Received on Thursday, 19 March 2015 08:04:29 UTC