Re: Should we pay more attention to SVG?

2015-07-24 12:03 GMT+02:00 Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>:

>  What about a technology talk about SVG at one of our telecons?
>

I like that idea!

Frans


>
>
> *Van:* Frans Knibbe [mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl]
> *Verzonden:* vrijdag 24 juli 2015 12:00
> *Aan:* SDW WG Public List
> *Onderwerp:* Should we pay more attention to SVG?
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I would like to direct your attention to a recent contribution that came
> in on the public comment list
> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-comments/2015Jul/0001.html>.
> My feeling is that we could try to strengthen ties between our work and SVG
> a bit.
>
>
>
> I propose to include SVG as one of the existing practices in the Compatibility
> with existing practices requirement
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#Compatibility>,
> so that SVG is at least explicitly mentioned in the UCR document, and less
> likely to be forgotten about in the BP work. But perhaps there is more that
> we could or should do?
>
>
>
> As an example, here <http://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/3711652> is a
> illustration of relevance of SVG to geographical/spatial data on the web.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Frans
>
>
>
> --
>
> Frans Knibbe
>
> Geodan
>
> President Kennedylaan 1
>
> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)
>
>
>
> T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
>
> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
>
> www.geodan.nl
>
> disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
>
>
>



-- 
Frans Knibbe
Geodan
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)

T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
www.geodan.nl
disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>