- From: Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:50:07 +0000
- To: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Andreas Harth <harth@kit.edu>
- Message-ID: <CAHrFjcmg2_S3fAtMHzUEazeFqdYDQZtTPx4rAVpYOqxOyGnV9w@mail.gmail.com>
This is a great discussion and I think it is central to the potentially difficult overlap between the two community perspectives. I'm sure Josh will chip in but I do think we need to recognise that we need to include spatial information for which it is not possible to define a geometry or have linked to as an attribute - This I think is what Josh means by context, I am writing this email from a location within "Central London" although there is not a canonical geometry that represents the shape of central London. This is an example of what Mike Goodchild calls a Platial Problem ! This must be in scope, does the current wording around spatial information accommodate it ? Ed On Thu Feb 19 2015 at 10:26:55 Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu> wrote: > Andreas's mail gives me the opportunity to explain the objection I > raised during the call [1] about the proposal of adding "spatial > context" into scope question #1 [2]. > > My main concern is that the use of "spatial context" in the scoping > question may be confusing, and probably unnecessary. > > In my understanding, spatial context is specified through spatial data > - i.e., it denotes one of their possible uses. So, "spatial data" > should be inclusive enough - it would cover spatial data as a whole, > irrespective of their use. > > Thanks! > > Andrea > > ---- > [1]http://www.w3.org/2015/02/18-sdw-minutes.html > [2]http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Scope_questions_and_Requirements > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Andreas Harth <harth@kit.edu> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the issue I had with the term "spatial context" is that I did not know > > what the "context" part was supposed to mean. > > > > If I understood Josh correctly, he mentioned that a geometry, > > a place description or a spatial feature should be referenceable > > in data. > > > > If "spatial context" does mean that, I'm fine with the phrasing of > > the scoping question. > > > > Cheers, > > Andreas. > > > > > > -- > Andrea Perego, Ph.D. > Scientific / Technical Project Officer > European Commission DG JRC > Institute for Environment & Sustainability > Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data > Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 > 21027 Ispra VA, Italy > > https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ > > ---- > The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may > not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official > position of the European Commission. > >
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2015 10:50:40 UTC