- From: Martin Desruisseaux <martin.desruisseaux@geomatys.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 18:04:32 +0200
- To: public-sdw-comments@w3.org, eparsons@google.com
- Message-ID: <f5cf4fe9-e4e9-e7d6-d594-5e34b91517b4@geomatys.com>
Hello Ed For EPSG codes, the best practice documents links to http://epsg.io in many places. Would it be possible to replace http://epsg.io links by http://epsg-registry.org links? The later is the only official source of EPSG definitions, and those two sources differ in axis order and other aspects. There is unfortunately a lot of confusion about axis order and (to lesser extend) units of measurement of CRS defined by EPSG codes, so I worry that having W3C referencing a site publishing non-compliant EPSG definitions may contribute to the confusion. For example the document has some sentences accurately describing WGS 84 as (Lat/Long), but the link to http://epsg.io/4326 describes a (Long/Lat) system (except in their GML definitions). The proposed replacements are: * http://epsg.io/28992 -> http://epsg-registry.org/?display=entity&urn=urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::28992 * http://epsg.io/27700 -> http://epsg-registry.org/?display=entity&urn=urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::27700 * /etc./ for all EPSG codes (a search in the HTML source code shows 22 occurrences). I suggest to also replace the following sentence in chapter 8: Definitions of coordinate reference systems are available from the Open Geospatial Consortium CRS Register, Spatial Reference and EPSG.io (an open-source web service which simplifies discovery of coordinate reference systems utilized worldwide). By Definitions of coordinate reference systems are available from the Open Geospatial Consortium CRS Register <http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/> and EPSG registry <http://epsg-registry.org/> (the official source of EPSG definitions). Other web services like Spatial Reference <http://spatialreference.org/> and EPSG.io <http://epsg.io> also provide definitions as used in popular software, but those definitions — especially the ones published in Well Known Text (WKT) version 1 format — sometime differ from official EPSG definitions in axis order and units of measurement. Regards, Martin Le 04/04/2017 à 15:16, Ed Parsons a écrit : > Hello Neil, > > I am working my way through the public comments made to the Spatial > Data on the Web working group prior to the release of final draft of > the Best Practice Document, current version here > https://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-bp/ > > Hopefully you will notice a section that deals specifically with > approaches to making metadata about spatial data including ISO 19115 > compliant metadata more accessible - there is more work to do in this > section before the final draft, but you very valid point about the > value of existing metadata records has been taken onboard. > > https://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-bp/#bp-metadata > > Would you allow me to therefore mark this comment as closed ? > > Many thanks for your contribution.
Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2017 16:05:10 UTC