- From: Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu>
- Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 16:16:21 -0700
- To: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>, <public-sdw-comments@w3.org>
Hi Erik, > to me the value proposition would be to explain to people that you can > be properly webby without having to subscribe to one specific > metamodel world. many people *want* to be webby (and are looking for > guidance), and not all of them want to use RDF. that's just the > reality out there. Sure, I absolutely agree. But webby does not equal Linked Data. There are many ways to be webby. > that's a tautology. there are vast amounts of linked data (small caps, > generic term) out there. just ask the library community, for example, > or many many others that have designed and used decentralized > networked data. but if you refuse to call those Linked Data (specific > term, RDF only), then of course it doesn't exist. It's not a tautology; see the W3C email thread I pointed to. > i don't think best practices should prescribe technologies. I see where you are going with this, but IMHO this is a too strong statement. Best, Krzysztof On 08/05/2015 03:55 PM, Erik Wilde wrote: > hello krzysztof. > > On 2015-08-05 15:20 , Krzysztof Janowicz wrote: >> This was intensively discussed on the Linked Data list about two years >> ago (https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2013Jun/). While >> you could envision Linked Data that is not RDF-based, it is difficult to >> do so -- especially for 5-star data. > > not really, no. it's just matter of definition. the definition was > made that it must be RDF, so now it must be RDF. case closed. > >> I certainly agree with what you are >> saying but trying to untangle this would be a nightmare and I am not >> sure what the value proposition would be. > > to me the value proposition would be to explain to people that you can > be properly webby without having to subscribe to one specific > metamodel world. many people *want* to be webby (and are looking for > guidance), and not all of them want to use RDF. that's just the > reality out there. > >> Clearly, the entire Web of >> Data does not need to be (and is not) RDF-based but I do not know of any >> Linked Data that is not RDF-based. > > that's a tautology. there are vast amounts of linked data (small caps, > generic term) out there. just ask the library community, for example, > or many many others that have designed and used decentralized > networked data. but if you refuse to call those Linked Data (specific > term, RDF only), then of course it doesn't exist. > > just go get back to the topic: i don't think best practices should > prescribe technologies. i think best practices should promote > patterns. hypermedia (or call it REST) is *the* pattern of the web, so > it would be good to see it being promoted. > > cheers, > > dret. > -- Krzysztof Janowicz Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2015 23:16:57 UTC