W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2016

[Bug 22509] Some way to express array as readonly and fixed length

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 21:15:34 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-22509-3890-IzVCKpEvoo@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |d@domenic.me
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #5 from Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me> ---
We used to have this, in T[]. It was removed in favor of FrozenArray and a
general movement toward a different pattern of returning a new frozen array
object each time. I think we won't go back to a T[]-like world, unless ES
somehow add readonly-but-not-immutable arrays as a first-class concept.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 21 October 2016 21:15:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:25 UTC