On 10/16/16 12:46 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote: > Looking at > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2016JanMar/0014.html, it > looks like a WebIDL requirement. > Boris, SimonP, can you comment on this? WebIDL provides a convenient syntax for the common case for serializers. It _does_ allow you do define a totally custom serializer, like so: serializer; and then defining its behavior in prose however you want. But note that the serializer syntax is in flux because it's overcomplicated already; see <https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/188>. That said, we should leave some way of specifying a completely custom serializer, but I see no reason it shouldn't just be the declaration of a method named toJSON which you then define in prose as usual to return whatever you want to return. -BorisReceived on Sunday, 16 October 2016 18:15:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:25 UTC