- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:03:52 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25048 --- Comment #9 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> --- > Its synchronous analogue is saying that getter.call(obj), when it fails, > should always throw the same error. This argument basically says to me that the basic idea of getters with Promise return values is wacky and we should be using a method instead... But I accept that others disagree on this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2016 14:04:01 UTC