[Bug 25048] consider whether an IDL attribute of type Promise<T> should catch exceptions and wrap them up as a rejected Promise like they are for operations


--- Comment #9 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> ---
> Its synchronous analogue is saying that getter.call(obj), when it fails,
> should always throw the same error.

This argument basically says to me that the basic idea of getters with Promise
return values is wacky and we should be using a method instead...  But I accept
that others disagree on this.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 13 October 2016 14:04:01 UTC