W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL Level 1; deadline December 9

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 17:25:49 +0100
Cc: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-Id: <EF3BE9AC-E237-41AC-81AE-2915792CA113@w3.org>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>

> On 02 Dec 2015, at 16:41, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
> On 12/2/15 8:23 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> Yves and Travis would like to publish a Candidate Recommendation of
>> WebIDL Level 1 and this is a Call for Consensus to do so. The draft CR is:
>> <https://ylafon.github.io/webidl/publications/cr-20151124.html>
> Just to check, is this basically identical to http://heycam.github.io/webidl/ or modified from it?  If modified, what are the modifications?

This is the same as the previous Level 1 WD (well, same differences, as the proposed CR doc is with the latest modifications to the edcopy, like with Date removed.
So same as http://heycam.github.io/webidl/ with maplike, setlike, [ImplicitThis], [Unscopeable], RegExp, FrozenArray and LegacyArrayClass removed.

> If it's basically identical, then we should probably merge in https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/72 before publishing, because otherwise the forEach bits for iterables are known to be complete nonsense.

That would be great.
> We should probably also come up with a list of issues that absolutely need to be resolved before we go to REC (e.g. <https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/62> aka <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22808> should probably be on that list).

Note that the goal is not to produce a document to be used for implementors of WebIDL (who should follow the edcopy), but a reference of what is implemented at the time of its publication for writers of other specifications (and the SoTD has a paragraph about this, it may be clearer or more visible), so the goal is not to produce a “perfect” REC, as it will be superseded by a new Level in the future, and always by the edcopy.
But yes, it would be good to have a list of the roadblocking issues.

Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2015 16:25:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:24 UTC