- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:56:27 +1100
- To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On 19/10/11 11:05 AM, Travis Leithead wrote: > We should consider adding "at risk" identification on features that > we expect might be cut (for example: modules). In this way they can > be removed during CR w/out dropping the spec status down to Working > draft again. With modules and the Java binding now out of the document, I don't know of any features that would be in this category. So I won't add an "at risk" identification for now. If there are features other than these that you think should be considered "at risk", let me know. Thanks, Cameron
Received on Monday, 12 December 2011 06:59:35 UTC