W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Web IDL: LC2 feedback

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:56:27 +1100
Message-ID: <4EE5A59B.1090103@mcc.id.au>
To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On 19/10/11 11:05 AM, Travis Leithead wrote:
> We should consider adding "at risk" identification on features that
> we expect might be cut (for example: modules). In this way they can
> be removed during CR w/out dropping the spec status down to Working
> draft again.

With modules and the Java binding now out of the document, I don't know
of any features that would be in this category.  So I won't add an "at
risk" identification for now.  If there are features other than these
that you think should be considered "at risk", let me know.


Received on Monday, 12 December 2011 06:59:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:05 UTC