- From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:13:03 +0000
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
>-----Original Message----- >From: Cameron McCormack [mailto:cam@mcc.id.au] >On 19/10/11 11:05 AM, Travis Leithead wrote: >> We should consider adding "at risk" identification on features that >> we expect might be cut (for example: modules). In this way they can >> be removed during CR w/out dropping the spec status down to Working >> draft again. > >With modules and the Java binding now out of the document, I don't know >of any features that would be in this category. So I won't add an "at >risk" identification for now. If there are features other than these >that you think should be considered "at risk", let me know. Sounds good. Thanks for the follow-up. -Travis
Received on Monday, 12 December 2011 20:13:37 UTC