W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: Fwd: [WebIDL] remove modules

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:31:50 +0200
To: "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>
Cc: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v1jbfcic64w2qv@g239.guest-int.opera.com>
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 06:27:15 +0200, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>  
> On 14/07/11 3:25 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> Having everything in the same module seems fine for the web platform.
> For the moment, I think that is fine.  Let's investigate further once  
> ECMAScript modules are available.
> I will mark modules as at-risk at CR (or perhaps reconsider dropping  
> them between LC2 and CR).  I don't think they are causing much harm in  
> there at the moment.
> Let me know if you find this resolution acceptable.

Who is going to implement this then? No W3C or WHATWG specification is  
using this.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 09:32:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:04 UTC