Re: [WebIDL] platform array objects

• From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
• Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:50:10 +1200
• To: "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>
• CC: public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>, andrew@ado.is-a-geek.net
• Message-ID: <4E4DEB82.2000101@mcc.id.au>

On 19/08/11 3:00 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> To be able to implement platform array objects with proxies, we need to
> expose configurable properties, since last I checked the Proxy proposal
> did not support exposing non-configurable properties. If this has
> changed, then I agree we should make it non-configurable.

I notice now though that I do have properties for [Unforgeable] IDL 
attributes be non-configurable.

Mark, Allen: what is the latest status on the Proxy proposal?  Is it 
possible for Proxy-implemented objects to expose non-configurable 
properties?

Received on Friday, 19 August 2011 04:50:59 UTC