Re: [WebIDL] platform array objects

On 19/08/11 3:00 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> To be able to implement platform array objects with proxies, we need to
> expose configurable properties, since last I checked the Proxy proposal
> did not support exposing non-configurable properties. If this has
> changed, then I agree we should make it non-configurable.

I notice now though that I do have properties for [Unforgeable] IDL 
attributes be non-configurable.

Mark, Allen: what is the latest status on the Proxy proposal?  Is it 
possible for Proxy-implemented objects to expose non-configurable 

Received on Friday, 19 August 2011 04:50:59 UTC