- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 03:53:22 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13249
Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #1 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> 2011-08-19 03:53:20 UTC ---
I think it would be a bit weird for [TreatNullAs] to apply only to the setter
when used on a nullable type. Or at least a little unobvious, so I'm inclined
not to allow it.
In response to timeless' comment, I added a note point out that it isn't
allowed on "DOMString?", but just now I have extended that to say why ("since
null is a valid value of that type").
Let me know if this is acceptable so that I can record this in the Disposition
of Comments.
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 19 August 2011 03:53:26 UTC