W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2011

[Bug 13249] Allow [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] for DOMString?, not just DOMString

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 03:53:22 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QuG94-00048G-12@jessica.w3.org>

Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #1 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> 2011-08-19 03:53:20 UTC ---
I think it would be a bit weird for [TreatNullAs] to apply only to the setter
when used on a nullable type.  Or at least a little unobvious, so I'm inclined
not to allow it.

In response to timeless' comment, I added a note point out that it isn't
allowed on "DOMString?", but just now I have extended that to say why ("since
null is a valid value of that type").

Let me know if this is acceptable so that I can record this in the Disposition
of Comments.


Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 19 August 2011 03:53:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:04 UTC