[+tvcutsem] On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > On 19/08/11 3:00 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote: > >> To be able to implement platform array objects with proxies, we need to >> expose configurable properties, since last I checked the Proxy proposal >> did not support exposing non-configurable properties. If this has >> changed, then I agree we should make it non-configurable. >> > > I notice now though that I do have properties for [Unforgeable] IDL > attributes be non-configurable. > > Mark, Allen: what is the latest status on the Proxy proposal? Is it > possible for Proxy-implemented objects to expose non-configurable > properties? > Not yet. Tom (cc'ed) will be proposing at the upcoming end-of-september meeting. I expect it to pass. -- Cheers, --MarkMReceived on Friday, 19 August 2011 04:54:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:04 UTC