Re: [WebIDL] platform array objects

[+tvcutsem]

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:

> On 19/08/11 3:00 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
>
>> To be able to implement platform array objects with proxies, we need to
>> expose configurable properties, since last I checked the Proxy proposal
>> did not support exposing non-configurable properties. If this has
>> changed, then I agree we should make it non-configurable.
>>
>
> I notice now though that I do have properties for [Unforgeable] IDL
> attributes be non-configurable.
>
> Mark, Allen: what is the latest status on the Proxy proposal?  Is it
> possible for Proxy-implemented objects to expose non-configurable
> properties?
>

Not yet. Tom (cc'ed) will be proposing at the upcoming end-of-september
meeting. I expect it to pass.

-- 
    Cheers,
    --MarkM