public-scholarlyhtml@w3.org from October 2017 by thread

Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? sebastien (Monday, 16 October)

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Peter (pt) Sefton (Tuesday, 17 October)
• RE: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Stian Soiland-Reyes (Tuesday, 17 October)
  • Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Johannes Wilm (Thursday, 19 October)
    • Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Mike Perlman (Thursday, 19 October)
      • Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Johannes Wilm (Thursday, 19 October)
        • Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Mike Perlman (Thursday, 19 October)
          • Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Mike Perlman (Thursday, 19 October)
        • Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Sarven Capadisli (Thursday, 19 October)
          • Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Johannes Wilm (Thursday, 19 October)
            • Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Sarven Capadisli (Thursday, 19 October)
            • Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Johannes Wilm (Thursday, 19 October)

Last message date: Thursday, 19 October 2017 15:54:36 UTC