public-scholarlyhtml@w3.org from October 2017 by date

Thursday, 19 October 2017

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Johannes Wilm
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Sarven Capadisli
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Johannes Wilm
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Sarven Capadisli
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Mike Perlman
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Mike Perlman
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Johannes Wilm
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Mike Perlman
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Johannes Wilm

Tuesday, 17 October 2017

• RE: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? Peter (pt) Sefton

Monday, 16 October 2017

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? sebastien

Last message date: Thursday, 19 October 2017 15:54:36 UTC