W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-scholarlyhtml@w3.org > October 2017

Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli?

From: Peter (pt) Sefton <pt@ptsefton.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 15:15:59 +1100
Message-ID: <CAGQnt7WRpGPyULeZOmneN6dUgwZnPvtWUOW68XBXAvg8rZytwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: sebastien <sebastien.ballesteros@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-scholarlyhtml@w3.org" <public-scholarlyhtml@w3.org>
Interesting.

I've recently been doing some work on using Scehma.org in RDFa for
describing data, many of the things we have done here would be relevant to
publications, such as authorship, publications etc.

See
https://github.com/UTS-eResearch/datacrate/blob/master/spec/0.1/data_crate_specification_v0.1.md

And an example you can download, check out the CATALOG.html :
https://zenodo.org/record/844394#.WeUrvhOCzOQ

On 16 October 2017 at 14:40, sebastien <sebastien.ballesteros@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> A quick update on science.ai documentation effort.
>
> As Robin mentioned we have been iterating quite a lot on scholarly
> HTML internally. What we learned along the way (working with several
> established players in the field) is that trying to standardize or
> define constraints at the HTML level is somewhat too constraining (we
> are planning to provide more context on that soon).
>
> In our case, agreeing on a vocabulary and using RDFa and / or JSON-LD
> to express it (without additional constraints) has proven to be more
> productive.  For us, schema.org (and the process in place to extend
> it) provides enough basis to make that work. For that reason we are
> now mostly focused on exposing and documenting schema.org patterns
> that are useful in the context of scholarly publishing.
>
> I will post an updated link when our documentation hits our production
> website but in the meantime feel free to check out
> https://nightly.science.ai/documentation/archive if you are curious
> about what we have been doing since the days of
> http://scholarly.vernacular.io/.  If you look don't pay too much
> attention to the archive stuff, but the JSON-LD / RDFa examples should
> provide a good idea of the schema.org patterns that we have found
> useful in the context of scholarly publishing.
>
> Sebastien
>
>
>


-- 
Peter Sefton +61410326955 pt@ptsefton.com http://ptsefton.com
Gmail, Twitter & Skype name: ptsefton
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2017 04:16:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:02 UTC