- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:18:36 +0100
- To: Raphael Wimmer <Raphael.Wimmer@sprachlit.uni-regensburg.de>
- Cc: info@csarven.ca, W3C Scholarly HTML CG <public-scholarlyhtml@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <26FC8A92-0B32-4A30-9497-D7C2BBA63DD3@w3.org>
> On 26 Nov 2015, at 13:58, Raphael Wimmer <Raphael.Wimmer@sprachlit.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > -- > Dr. Raphael Wimmer > Lehrstuhl für Medieninformatik / Media Informatics Group > Universität Regensburg > 93040 Regensburg > Germany > > > Tel.: +49 941 943-3170 > Mobile: +49 160 1085681 > Fax: +49 941 943-2429 > > > E-Mail: raphael.wimmer@ur.de > Web: http://www.raphael.cc > Twitter: http://twitter.com/RaphaelWimmer > Skype: real_raphman > > >>>> Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> 11/26/15 1:31 PM >>> >> On 26 Nov 2015, at 11:19, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote: >>> I think the name of this CG is too narrow. Are we only talking about HTML? > It is also the same generic name used by one of the tools. Consider renaming. > My suggestion is to remain somewhat agnostic about the technology e.g., HTML, > even though I'm sure that many of us are in agreement on that. I propose > "Linked Research" as it better captures the actual initiative. >> I would not agree with that. If we get to generic then we get nowhere. The > issue is very very practical: to get to the point when scholarly publishing can > be based, at last, on the Open Web Platform, ie, producing articles that are > displayed through the usual Web environment. This means to use HTML5. The > 'linked research' is an important but, in this respect, secondary to the goals > of the CG. Ie, let us stay focused… > > > > I tend to agree with Ivan. I was drawn to this community group because I am > interested in the practical usability and utility of publishing and > collaborating using open standards (and HTML is the de-facto standard). > To me, the description of the group sounded like a place where concrete > practical aspects of publishing scientific papers written in HTML are > discussed. > > FWIW, my primary topics of interest include: > > - How to model the current structure of scientific papers (e.g. keywords, > figures, footnotes, references) in HTML. Most parts seem straighforward, for > others no HTML equivalent seems to exist. > - How to represent references to other works in a way that is robust, > versatile, and extendable. > - How to make authoring of scientific papers in HTML as easy as possible > - How to make HTML-only papers archivable and robust against link-rot and > different/changing browser implementations (e.g., it would be bad if charts > were displayed differently by different browsers) > - How to use the capabilities of the WWW (links, interactivity, collaboration) > for enhancing scientific communication. > - How to get conferences / journals to accept submissions in HTML format (a > topic, we are currently looking at). > > Is this the right forum for discussing such questions? > That would be my choice:-) That being said, we may want to wait for Robin's opinion who, after all, initiated this CG. However, he is busy cooking and eating a turkey in New York today… Ivan > All the Best, > Raphael > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Thursday, 26 November 2015 13:18:49 UTC