Re: Support for XHTML5

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote:

>
> Reading the feedback on this thread, here is what I propose:
>
>   • The language is itself defined atop the DOM, with no reference to
> syntax or encoding.
>
>   • We include a section with considerations for stringent
> interoperability and long-term archival that has stricter rules on
> syntax and encoding.
>
> Then we can validate both separately.
>
>
That works well for me.

It may help to provide a large proportion of the examples in UTF-8.
(Are we likely to be concerned about normalization of
characters/codepoints?  [1])


[1] http://unicode.org/faq/normalization.html


> --
> • Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
> • http://science.ai/ — intelligent science publishing
> •
>
>


-- 
Peter Murray-Rust
Reader in Molecular Informatics
Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
CB2 1EW, UK
+44-1223-763069