Hi Robin, > The most important one is: > > I would strongly recommend that SH be defined at the vocabulary level > (ie. on a parsed DOM), not at the syntax level. I agree with that as a goal. Maybe would be useful to add it in the file in the repo https://github.com/w3c/scholarly-html/blob/gh-pages/goals.md <https://github.com/w3c/scholarly-html/blob/gh-pages/goals.md> in order to have a bit of discussion about it with all the others. What do you think? However, I would like also to suggest to clarify this position in the (future) spec of SH, and also to provide a description/tools for dealing with SH documents in both HTML and XHTML (modulo Appendix C?) syntaxes – I firmly believe that any kind of support to existing publishing pipelines we are able to provide will be crucial for a broad adoption of SH. Have a nice day :-) S. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Silvio Peroni, Ph.D. Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Bologna, Bologna (Italy) Tel: +39 051 2094871 E-mail: silvio.peroni@unibo.it Web: http://www.essepuntato.it Twitter: essepuntato
Received on Friday, 4 December 2015 16:43:34 UTC