Re: Current status of the healthcare extension

Hi again Dan,
When ready to include it we should also update some describing texts
I have attached here an introduction message (rationale) and Documentation
text updated.
They are still in track-change format as anyone can update them.
At the end just we accepte all changes.

Regards and thanks again to keep this on the agenda.

Marc

On 29 February 2016 at 13:45, Marc Twagirumukiza <twamarc@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Dan!
> Currently
> * tests from my side (python scripts/run_tests.py) are OK. previously
> re-checked by @RichardWallis as well.
> * test build: http://health.sdo-schemedex.appspot.com/
> * pull request : https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/pull/11 (merged
> with sdo-phobos but not yet merged with sdo-deimos! until this is
> required).
> ~ Marc
>
> On 29 February 2016 at 13:42, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, I think it is time we moved on this. Can you point me to the right
>> pullrequest on github and I will merge it into sdo-deimos for review. I
>> think there might be a few terms that need to be left in core but the
>> general direction was looking good...
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, 13:31 Marc Twagirumukiza <twamarc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Fabian,
>>> Thanks touching base to this. The status of the extension can be tracked
>>> (followed) from :
>>> https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/492
>>>
>>> Currently we the suggestion was to ask schema.org if they can publish
>>> the current version of the extension and the CG continue to follow up the
>>> improvement (eg. the big discussion about twamarc/ScheMed#36
>>> <https://github.com/twamarc/ScheMed/issues/36>, other issues,
>>> extensions, etc.).
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Marc
>>>
>>> On 29 February 2016 at 13:09, Fabian Cretton <Fabian.Cretton@hevs.ch>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I was reading a few documents about the activity of the group, but
>>>> couldn't determine what is the current status.
>>>> It seems that the official health/medical schema.org page [1] still
>>>> don't mention the proposed extension.
>>>>
>>>> As the group seemed to be active until August 2015 [2], is it possible
>>>> to know what is the current status of the group and the proposed vocabulary
>>>> [3] ?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you
>>>> Fabian Cretton
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://schema.org/docs/meddocs.html
>>>> [2] https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/pull/11
>>>> [3] http://health.sdo-schemedex.appspot.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>