Re: Current status of the healthcare extension

Thanks Dan!
Currently
* tests from my side (python scripts/run_tests.py) are OK. previously
re-checked by @RichardWallis as well.
* test build: http://health.sdo-schemedex.appspot.com/
* pull request : https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/pull/11 (merged
with sdo-phobos but not yet merged with sdo-deimos! until this is
required).
~ Marc

On 29 February 2016 at 13:42, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:

> Yes, I think it is time we moved on this. Can you point me to the right
> pullrequest on github and I will merge it into sdo-deimos for review. I
> think there might be a few terms that need to be left in core but the
> general direction was looking good...
>
> Dan
>
> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, 13:31 Marc Twagirumukiza <twamarc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Fabian,
>> Thanks touching base to this. The status of the extension can be tracked
>> (followed) from :
>> https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/492
>>
>> Currently we the suggestion was to ask schema.org if they can publish
>> the current version of the extension and the CG continue to follow up the
>> improvement (eg. the big discussion about twamarc/ScheMed#36
>> <https://github.com/twamarc/ScheMed/issues/36>, other issues,
>> extensions, etc.).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Marc
>>
>> On 29 February 2016 at 13:09, Fabian Cretton <Fabian.Cretton@hevs.ch>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was reading a few documents about the activity of the group, but
>>> couldn't determine what is the current status.
>>> It seems that the official health/medical schema.org page [1] still
>>> don't mention the proposed extension.
>>>
>>> As the group seemed to be active until August 2015 [2], is it possible
>>> to know what is the current status of the group and the proposed vocabulary
>>> [3] ?
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>> Fabian Cretton
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] http://schema.org/docs/meddocs.html
>>> [2] https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/pull/11
>>> [3] http://health.sdo-schemedex.appspot.com/
>>>
>>>
>>
>>