- From: Arnaud Sahuguet <arnaud.sahuguet@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:33:40 -0400
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJb-C87+MkiMzJSKD0HwRY3jeqG_apv82+ux9k4F_iNC0PctTw@mail.gmail.com>
I also checked parks, playgrounds, public libraries and they have the "Wheelchair accessible entrance" attribute on Google Maps. On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:24 PM Arnaud Sahuguet <arnaud.sahuguet@gmail.com> wrote: > This is the good old chicken-vs-egg problem. > When I worked on https://schema.org/GovernmentService, I got all excited > about getting the schema perfect. I don't think I spent enough time > building some concrete examples for it, e.g. for New York City. And when I > checked the adoption (via Google Crawl) it was abysmally low. We had a few > early adopters in the south part of Latin America. > > Now being on the other side, it feels a bit like using Lego, but with no > instruction manual. Yes, you can build something, but it takes time and it > often does not look polished enough. We also have to convince ourselves and > the people using the schemas that (a) best is the enemy of good and (b) > even a subset of the info properly tagged is better than nothing. > > For accessibility, checking on Google Maps, I found the generic > "accessible" for hotels. I also found "accessible entrance" and "accessible > parking". Could we reuse what they have? > I also found a 700+ page dissertation on the topic ( > https://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/33172/7/ETD_Dissertation_Benner-9.1.17.pdf > ). > > It seems that "Wheelchair accessible entrance" is the lowest common > denominator and is non-controversial. Maybe we can start from there. The > school I am using as an example says "non accessible" (they don't have a > ramp; they don't have an elevator). So, flagging it as with s:hasWheelchairAccessibleEntrance > "false"^^xsd:boolean should indicate that a) the entrance is not > wheelchair accessible and (b) the school is not accessible (implied). > > I am surprised this is not being used already. The travel industry should > be a big user of such a feature. > > Arnaud > > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 1:46 PM Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > >> Note that at least in UK public schools and private schools are both >> expensive rather than free and state funded! >> >> For wheelchair accessibility there should be extensive notes in GitHub or >> the old wiki but we never finalised a representation - largely because >> nobody stepped up to implement something consuming it. In absence of such >> use cases it is hard to settle on a level of detail. But we should do >> something! >> >> On Wed, 3 Apr 2024, 18:15 Arnaud Sahuguet, <arnaud.sahuguet@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> After police stations and fire stations, I am looking at *public >>> schools.* >>> >>> >>> I could not find a property related to *accessibility*, e.g. wheelchair >>> accessible. >>> >>> The school schema and its parents do not contain anything related to >>> *grade* level. >>> Here is a concrete example (my kids's school) where grade is described >>> using an enumeration "PK,0K,01,02,03,04,05,SE". (source= >>> https://www.schools.nyc.gov/schools/M185) >>> The closest is https://schema.org/educationalLevel, but this is not the >>> same. >>> >>> What's the recommended way of capturing this info? >>> >>> -- >>> Arnaud >>> >>> > > -- > Arnaud Sahuguet > > -- Arnaud Sahuguet
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2024 18:33:57 UTC