- From: Rohan Kumar <seirdy@seirdy.one>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 10:25:43 -0700
- To: "Joseph D. Smith" <joseph.jds.smith@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-schemaorg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20220721172543.e3hvmo3btffmsl4n@seirdy.one>
I love the idea. I'm in 15 webrings and a bunch of directories myself, and I think we need a way to declare that a website is part of a community of websites. I think that this is better done with an RDFa schema that can be used with microdata, RDFa, or JSON-LD. Many webring participants have hand-coded and/or statically-generated sites, so markup-based approaches might be easier for them. You might want to reach out to the owners of other webrings to gauge interest in a common schema. There's a bit of a "webring renaissance" happening right now, with many small rings cropping up. I helped Sadness put this list of active webrings together: https://sadgrl.online/cyberspace/webrings.html If/when you do: I think it's worth emphasizing that big search engines aren't the only beneficiaries. Many webring participants are a bit SEO-averse and prefer discovering their sites through more "manual" or "organic" means. I can think of tons of other use-cases; these are a few off the top of my head: - data visualizations that map out web communities - combining with "traditional" webrings to help ensure all participants include the required links on their sites (no "broken rings") - auto-generating web directories - curated search engines for small communities (see https://lieu.cblgh.org/) for an example Just as politicians like to say that "small businesses are the backbone of our economy", I like to say that "independent creators are the backbone of our culture". Discovering independent/personal sites is hard, and the current webring renaissance is a welcome sight for sore eyes. I hope that some sort of structured data could gently modernize them while still preserving the simplicity that made them special. -- Seirdy (https://seirdy.one)
Received on Thursday, 21 July 2022 17:26:31 UTC