Re: Identity Negation using the Schema.org vocabulary?

While not a direct assertion, if you *did* want to use schema.org for your
purposes you could employ disambiguatingDescription
<https://schema.org/disambiguatingDescription>.

On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 1:10 AM Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com>
wrote:

> Why not just use OWL for this? Not every construct can or should be in
> schema.org.
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 9:03 AM <dan.btown@hotmail.de> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > using the Schema.org vocabulary, what would be the way to go to assert
> > that two entities are not identical?
> >
> > For the sake of example, how could it be asserted that the URIs
> > "foo-bar.idea" and "foobar.idea" do not identify the same entity?
> >
> > AFAIK or see, this can not be asserted with the Schema.org vocabulary
> alone.
> >
> > Is a way to go (again only for the sake of example) to borrow from OWL2
> > and derive Schema.org relations from
> >
> > - owl:DifferentIndividuals
> > -- https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Individual_Inequality
> >
> > - owl:NegativeObjectPropertyAssertion
> > --
> https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Negative_Object_Property_Assertions
> >
> > - owl:NegativeDataPropertyAssertion
> > -- https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Negative_Data_Property_Assertions
> >
> >
> > Any hints sheding glitter on this mystery would be greatly appreciated!
> (:
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > -- Dan
> >
> >
> >
> > Keywords: Negation, Complement, Inequality, Open World Assumption,
> > Closed World Assumption.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>