While not a direct assertion, if you *did* want to use schema.org for your purposes you could employ disambiguatingDescription <https://schema.org/disambiguatingDescription>. On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 1:10 AM Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com> wrote: > Why not just use OWL for this? Not every construct can or should be in > schema.org. > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 9:03 AM <dan.btown@hotmail.de> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > using the Schema.org vocabulary, what would be the way to go to assert > > that two entities are not identical? > > > > For the sake of example, how could it be asserted that the URIs > > "foo-bar.idea" and "foobar.idea" do not identify the same entity? > > > > AFAIK or see, this can not be asserted with the Schema.org vocabulary > alone. > > > > Is a way to go (again only for the sake of example) to borrow from OWL2 > > and derive Schema.org relations from > > > > - owl:DifferentIndividuals > > -- https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Individual_Inequality > > > > - owl:NegativeObjectPropertyAssertion > > -- > https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Negative_Object_Property_Assertions > > > > - owl:NegativeDataPropertyAssertion > > -- https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Negative_Data_Property_Assertions > > > > > > Any hints sheding glitter on this mystery would be greatly appreciated! > (: > > > > Cheers > > > > -- Dan > > > > > > > > Keywords: Negation, Complement, Inequality, Open World Assumption, > > Closed World Assumption. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Received on Thursday, 4 February 2021 13:52:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 4 February 2021 13:52:50 UTC