- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:07:44 +0100
- To: dan.btown@hotmail.de
- Cc: "schema. org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
Why not just use OWL for this? Not every construct can or should be in schema.org. On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 9:03 AM <dan.btown@hotmail.de> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > using the Schema.org vocabulary, what would be the way to go to assert > that two entities are not identical? > > For the sake of example, how could it be asserted that the URIs > "foo-bar.idea" and "foobar.idea" do not identify the same entity? > > AFAIK or see, this can not be asserted with the Schema.org vocabulary alone. > > Is a way to go (again only for the sake of example) to borrow from OWL2 > and derive Schema.org relations from > > - owl:DifferentIndividuals > -- https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Individual_Inequality > > - owl:NegativeObjectPropertyAssertion > -- https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Negative_Object_Property_Assertions > > - owl:NegativeDataPropertyAssertion > -- https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Negative_Data_Property_Assertions > > > Any hints sheding glitter on this mystery would be greatly appreciated! (: > > Cheers > > -- Dan > > > > Keywords: Negation, Complement, Inequality, Open World Assumption, > Closed World Assumption. > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 4 February 2021 09:08:07 UTC