W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > February 2021

Re: Identity Negation using the Schema.org vocabulary?

From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:07:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CAE35Vmyt4QPaJT=AiLMMy1BY8MwPG1WQydSjbneX2aVj2g10iQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: dan.btown@hotmail.de
Cc: "schema. org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
Why not just use OWL for this? Not every construct can or should be in
schema.org.

On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 9:03 AM <dan.btown@hotmail.de> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> using the Schema.org vocabulary, what would be the way to go to assert
> that two entities are not identical?
>
> For the sake of example, how could it be asserted that the URIs
> "foo-bar.idea" and "foobar.idea" do not identify the same entity?
>
> AFAIK or see, this can not be asserted with the Schema.org vocabulary alone.
>
> Is a way to go (again only for the sake of example) to borrow from OWL2
> and derive Schema.org relations from
>
> - owl:DifferentIndividuals
> -- https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Individual_Inequality
>
> - owl:NegativeObjectPropertyAssertion
> -- https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Negative_Object_Property_Assertions
>
> - owl:NegativeDataPropertyAssertion
> -- https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Negative_Data_Property_Assertions
>
>
> Any hints sheding glitter on this mystery would be greatly appreciated! (:
>
> Cheers
>
> -- Dan
>
>
>
> Keywords: Negation, Complement, Inequality, Open World Assumption,
> Closed World Assumption.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 4 February 2021 09:08:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 4 February 2021 09:08:08 UTC