W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > June 2020

Re: scholarlyArticle no DOI

From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 21:14:11 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD47Kz7DiMxpj-AU2RLUd+E_hCL8Zi5rJb51W5gjoC4kmoWAng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hugh Paterson III <sil.linguist@gmail.com>
Cc: public-schemaorg@w3c.org
Hugh,

What is meant by the acronym string you put into a propertyID property is
down to recognised usage/convention/it is the same string as used often
elsewhere on the web - from the bibliographic world *oclcnum* for example.

However, if you want to be a bit more specific, check out the description
of the propertyID <https://schema.org/propertyID> property.

This includes "*or (3) a URL indicating the type of the property, either
pointing to an external vocabulary, or a Web resource that describes the
property*"

So in our example this could be an option:

{
   "@context": "http://schema.org",
   "@type": "Article",
   "name": "DOI Handbook",
   "identifier": {
       "@type": "PropertyValue",
       "propertyID": "http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q25670",
       "value": "10.1000/182"
   }
}



~Richard.

Richard Wallis
Founder, Data Liberate
http://dataliberate.com
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
Twitter: @rjw



On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 19:40, Hugh Paterson III <sil.linguist@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thank you for this example. Very helpful.
>
> As I'm plugging away, I'm wondering: How will another system or crawler
> know what I mean by DOI rather than taking it just as a text stream? It
> seems that I could invoke another schema and mark up the content dually
> with that, or I could use a schema.org internal mechanism with "sameAs"
> so my question is: within the PropertyValue type, does sameAs align with
> the propertyID, or the value? The website documentation doesn't specify.
>
> -all the best,
> Hugh
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 5:08 PM Richard Wallis <
> richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote:
>
>> As with all Schema.org types ScholarlyArticle
>> <https://schema.org/ScholarlyArticle> can have an associated identifier
>> <https://schema.org/identifier> property defined.
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> {
>>    "@context": "http://schema.org",
>>    "@type": "Article",
>>    "name": "DOI Handbook",
>>    "identifier": {
>>        "@type": "PropertyValue",
>>        "propertyID": "doi",
>>        "value": "10.1000/182"
>>    }
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Richard Wallis
>> Founder, Data Liberate
>> http://dataliberate.com
>> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
>> Twitter: @rjw
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 15:36, Hugh Paterson III <sil.linguist@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> I'm wondering why there is no DOI "attribute" listed under
>>> scholarlyArticle. DOI resolvers are fairly important and mainstream, with
>>> the Datacite API one can generally get the publication metadata of most
>>> currently published articles.
>>>
>>> It seems that editEIDR  solves the same kind of identification function,
>>> so it seems that someone has suggested that this kind of functionality is
>>> useful (which I agree it is). I'm wondering if there is any discussion for
>>> adding DOI or abstracting to an "attribute" which would allow for the use
>>> of Handles, URN's ARK's, DOI's, LSIDs etc.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, how are people choosing to encode DOI's?
>>>
>>> all the best,
>>> - Hugh
>>>
>>>
>>> for specifics on terms:
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifier
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archival_Resource_Key
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LSID
>>>
>>>
>>>
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2020 20:14:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 11 June 2020 20:14:38 UTC