- From: Hugh Paterson III <sil.linguist@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 16:33:30 +0200
- To: public-schemaorg@w3c.org
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2020 14:33:55 UTC
Greetings, I'm wondering why there is no DOI "attribute" listed under scholarlyArticle. DOI resolvers are fairly important and mainstream, with the Datacite API one can generally get the publication metadata of most currently published articles. It seems that editEIDR solves the same kind of identification function, so it seems that someone has suggested that this kind of functionality is useful (which I agree it is). I'm wondering if there is any discussion for adding DOI or abstracting to an "attribute" which would allow for the use of Handles, URN's ARK's, DOI's, LSIDs etc. Otherwise, how are people choosing to encode DOI's? all the best, - Hugh for specifics on terms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifier https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archival_Resource_Key https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LSID
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2020 14:33:55 UTC