- From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:27:10 +0100
- To: Martin Bean <martin@martinbean.co.uk>
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAD47Kz5T79Wd6V354Fu+d0LR4_AQCJa20sUzf9Uz_S67wsdL6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Martin, Your logic with regard to *provider* is correct. Then the 'seller' would be linked to the *VideoObject* via an *Offer* to sell, including price, availability, etc. : In simple terms VideoObject > offers > Offer > offeredBy (or seller) ~Richard Richard Wallis Founder, Data Liberate http://dataliberate.com Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis Twitter: @rjw On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 11:15, Martin Bean <martin@martinbean.co.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > I’m looking for the right Schema.org type for my scenario but can’t quite > decide which is the right one. > > I have a video on demand marketplace when a channel can sign up and offer > videos for rent. The marketplace is called Your Fight Site VOD. The > platform itself I’ve described as simply a WebSite. Videos are naturally > a VideoObject type, but I’m struggling to decide what type the *channel* offering > the videos for rent should be marked up as? > > It seems the VideoObject has a provider property with the description: > “Another party (a seller) may offer those services or goods on behalf of > the provider”. That seems to explain my use case, where the channel is the > provider but my platform is the seller, but there’s no “seller” property on > the VideoObject (that I can see). So how do I describe that the video > belongs to a channel, but the seller is my platform? > > Any guidance would be most appreciated! > > -- > *Martin Bean* > Web developer, consultant, author, and speaker > > *Website:* martinbean.co.uk > *Twitter:* @martinbean <http://twitter.com/martinbean> > *LinkedIn:* http://www.linkedin.com/in/martinbean > *Skype:* mcbwebdesign >
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2020 12:27:35 UTC