- From: Hugo Scott <hugo@hugoscott.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:57:03 +0100
- To: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOJ1cMQqVPb+sdV0y3iUMDxb9HEtOUQ0zEsQJjdcVj-SYsco8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hello there Here in France some professions (this one is for a real estate agent) are required by law to declare their insurers or underwriters and I thought it might be interesting to try to mark it up in the structured data too. As there isn't a property like "underwrittenBy" or "insuredBy" I thought of trying to do it with an additional type like this: "@type": "Service", (... bla bla bla ...) "additionalProperty":{ "name":"underwritten by", "value": { "@type": "InsuranceAgency", "name":"ALLIANZ", "sameAs":"https://www.allianz.fr/", "image":"https://www.allianz.fr/media/logo_allianz.png" }, "sameAs":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurance" } However, it occurred to me that because the relationship between the two entities - the insurer and the insured company - is not clear (ie not officially defined), it may just be confusing matters to include another organization in the block of code What do you think? Is it worth putting the insuring company in? Thanks Hugo Scott <https://www.malt.fr/profile/hugoscott>
Received on Friday, 20 December 2019 08:57:22 UTC