I agree that Time ontology is useful and we have use it describe historical
newspaper metadata ourselves.
But how is redefining == helping? The ontology is out there on the web,
dereferenceable and ready to use, with schema.org or without.
The Semantic Web *is* the general web.
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chaals,
>
> This is actually not true. The "general" web sometimes doesn't mark
> things up properly, yes, that is true. But there are standards in place
> like Owl Time that can capture and structure Periods of Time quite
> effectively. https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/#geologictimescale
>
> The real question is, when do we add parts of Owl Time to Schema.org to
> begin to help the "general" web for Temporal Entities.
>
> +1 add parts of Owl Time to Schema.org sometime this year to help the
> "general" web.
>
> -Thad
>