Re: Eurocentrism, incorrect unit abbreviations, and proprietary Royalist Engish (sic) terms

It's the same as the earlier structure I proposed but with Individual
renamed to Rentable, typical usage would be a campground with many rentable
campsites. It compares to https://schema.org/docs/hotels.html in the
following way Dan:

Place
    Accommodation
        RentableCampsite
        Room
            HotelRoom
    Campsite
        Campground
        RentableCampsite
    LocalBusiness
        LodgingBusiness
            Campground
            Hotel

Organization
    LocalBusiness
        LodgingBusiness
            Campground
            Hotel


I'm from Australia and live in California and in my experience the numbered
areas are referred to as campsites. Here is a government page that uses
"campsite" in this way many times, even referring to a more specific type
of campsite - a family campsite ("Family campsites accommodate up to eight
(8) people.", www.parks.ca.gov/camping).

But anyway like I said, it's not about a preference for British or American
English, it's about how to approach regions of space or time when larger
regions can be made of smaller regions describable using the same term.

How does it break the GoodRelations model Martin? In any case I'm not
proposing having GTIN at the level of Thing but it would be a fantastic
approach anyway, it would be similar to what we currently have with
faxNumber at the level of Place. But I know Product isn't going anywhere so
don't worry even I would hate to open that can of worms right now.

Anthony


On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:10 AM Webfeet <schema@webfeet.org> wrote:

> On 11/07/18 17:09, Martin Hepp wrote:
>
> > Re more complicated:
> > The concept of MTEs is a bit more difficult to understand, some tools
> will not validate data properly, Microdata has non proper support for MTEs,
> and the approach for MTES varies by syntax (Microdata, RDFa, JSON-LD).
>
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2018, 21:54 Anthony Moretti, <anthony.moretti@gmail.com
> <mailto:anthony.moretti@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> > ... I would actually prefer to not have CampingPitch at all and use
> > MTEs, but from reading this thread it seems that approach has its
> > problems.
>
> On 13/07/18 08:04, Dan Brickley wrote:
>
> > How does that compare with the pattern in
> > https://schema.org/docs/hotels.html ?
>
> https://schema.org/docs/hotels.html does include a statement that:
>
>     The markup for MTE's is very simple:
>
> and indeed the example there is nice, tidy and straightforward.
>
> I see that this doesn't address the tools/validation issues - but
> Multiple Inheritance and MTE's are there (and long established?) and, to
> this particular "Interested Observer", remarkably powerful.
>
> Regards,
>
>     Webfeet
>
>
>
>