- From: Martin Alvarez-Espinar <martin.alvarez@ctic.es>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 13:34:17 +0200
- To: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>, "public-sport-schema@w3.org" <public-sport-schema@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAL8AgZSvqv7uQgJRmbNjk6W4F=ZWJiCeRo4BTm95HA4Q=oFvsw@mail.gmail.com>
Dear all, In May 2017 I announced [1] the ongoing works to develop a vocabulary for Athletics. We created an abstract model to describe all features of an athletics competition, trying to align the proposal to schema.org. The model was too specific (i.e., many concrete features related to the management of track and field competitions), so we decided to split it into three main parts: 1) High-level competition -> events calendar 2) Stakeholders -> athletes, federations, clubs, etc. 3) Concrete details of the competition (e.g., performances during a competition, disqualification reason, etc.) I've drafted a document with the vocabulary and its alignment to Schema. Indeed, we can use over a 95% of the existing types and properties. The rest of the elements may be of interest to Schema.org. Although our target is athletics, the proposal has a broader scope, and I've considered the previous work of the Sports task force [2]. The document [3] is perhaps too verbose, with information for those who are not familiar with semantic technologies, but you can go directly to the Overview of the model [4]. There, where you can see the model at a glance with two SVGs [5][6] with the new classes/properties in bold red (sometimes I have to refresh my browser to see the images). The proposal includes new properties and these main additional Types: * Athlete, SportsGoverningBody * SportsCompetitionEvent, CompetitiveAudience, SportsDiscipline Also, I've deployed a version of this schema as a Schema.org extension [7] to play with. On October 9-11, Most of the European Athletics federations will meet in an annual conference so we would like to present a stable proposal and test the feasibility of this vocabulary as a common representation of, at least, competitions and athletes. On Oct 23, during the TPAC in Lyon, our group will meet to discuss it as well. This work is promoted by European Athletics, and they are convinced. I think we have a good opportunity here to engage the world of athletics in the use of Schema.org. Please let us know what you think of this idea. I'll be glad to discuss it with whoever is interested. Of course, if there is interest, I'll continue with the work following the protocols for the submission. All the best, Martin [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-schemaorg/2017May/0026.html [2] https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Sports [3] https://w3c.github.io/opentrack-cg/spec/competition/ <https://w3c.github.io/opentrack-cg/spec/competition/#overview-of-the-model> [4] https://w3c.github.io/opentrack-cg/spec/competition/#overview-of-the-model [5] https://w3c.github.io/opentrack-cg/spec/competition/images/high-level-competition_model.svg [6] https://w3c.github.io/opentrack-cg/spec/competition/images/competitor_model.svg [7] http://athletics.sdo-athletics.appspot.com/ -- *Martín Álvarez-Espinar* *martin.alvarez@ctic.es <martin.alvarez@ctic.es>* | Skype: martin.alvarez <http://www.fundacionctic.org/> <http://www.w3c.es/> *CTIC Centro Tecnológico* C/ Ada Byron, 39 | 33203 Gijón | Asturias | España (Spain) Ph: (+34) 984 291 212 <+34984291212> Web <http://www.fundacionctic.org/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/fundacionctic> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/fundacion-ctic> | Privacy <http://www.fundacionctic.org/privacidad>
Received on Monday, 2 July 2018 11:34:55 UTC