Good for me too. Any blog post about this release is planned ? 2017-03-16 17:45 GMT+01:00 R.V.Guha <guha@guha.com>: > Looks good to me. > > guha > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Stéphane Corlosquet < > scorlosquet@gmail.com> wrote: > >> no objections from me. looks good. >> >> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Re-pinging ... Nicolas, Stephane, Charles any review comments? Others? >>> >>> There are a few additional things to consider noted in the github >>> tracking issue but the proposal is basically as circulated >>> previously... >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> On 3 March 2017 at 04:24, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: >>> > Dear Schema.org Community Group, Steering Group, >>> > >>> > Based on our consensus discussions here and in Github, here is a >>> > proposal for a new Schema.org release, version 3.2: >>> > http://webschemas.org/docs/releases.html >>> > >>> > I'd like to aim at publishing this around March 15th. Bugs, mistakes, >>> > typos, modeling and example improvements and other detailed review >>> > comments are welcome here or in the issue tracker at >>> > https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1292 >>> > >>> > cheers, >>> > >>> > Dan >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Steph. >> > >
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2017 16:50:23 UTC