W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > February 2017

Re: W3C support

From: Hans Polak <info@polak.es>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 11:00:34 +0100
To: Stuart Turner <turner.stuart@gmail.com>
Cc: Elias Kaerle <elias.kaerle@sti2.at>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <c646b592-bfc3-aaa3-82db-db85d352fbf2@polak.es>
Hi Stuart,


I think this would be a good place for all tools related to Schema.org 
(excepting, maybe, the Schema.org code itself).

The generator code itself is ontology agnostic. As long as it receives a 
well structured request, it will output a well structured microdata, 
json-ld or rdfa.

I've spend a fair amount of time documenting both the code and the 
interface as they are/were, so contributing should be reasonably 
straightforward.


Cheers,

Hans




On 02/08/2017 06:17 PM, Stuart Turner wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> I believe the specific nuance of Elias' question is, do you intend 
> this to be a community resource sponsored by the W3C only about your 
> specific tool, or a tool agnostic forum about the requirements and 
> features of these tools in general? For example, normative/informative 
> requirements, best-practices, patterns/anti-patterns, etc.
>
> I support the latter, not necessarily the former (e.g. you can 
> obviously host a discussion within your project on GitHub), although 
> such a group can certainly concentrate on your schema-generator as the 
> community desires. I'm not a W3C member, so I can't provide any 
> further support other than my comment here.
>
> I am thrilled to see you've released this as an open source product 
> because we would consider contributing to it and releasing a subset of 
> it as a resource for those openly publishing peer reviewed "clinical 
> knowledge summaries" (an evidence-based medicine paradigm) under 
> MedicalEntity, clinical guidelines, etc.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~ Stuart
>
>> On Feb 8, 2017, at 8:46 AM, Hans Polak <info@polak.es 
>> <mailto:info@polak.es>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Elias,
>>
>> The generator, as it works today 
>> <https://schema.pythonanywhere.com/>, is able to generate valid 
>> microdata, json-ld and rdfa's from Schema.org <http://schema.org> 
>> (plus extensions). A user can add information about the 
>> Product/Place/etc before generating the output.
>>
>> In future, it will also be able to generate example schemas for 
>> proposed ontologies (discussed in the current mailing list)
>>
>> I hope that answers your question,
>> Hans
>>
>>
>>
>> On 02/08/2017 04:50 PM, Elias Kaerle wrote:
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>> quick question: is this about a specificschema.org <http://schema.org>  generator, or sdo
>>> generators in general - what they should look like, what they should
>>> support?
>>>
>>> Best, E.
>>>
>>> On 08.02.2017 16:43, Hans Polak wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Only one more person is needed for the schema-generator-community-group
>>>> <https://www.w3.org/community/blog/2017/02/02/proposed-group-schema-generator-community-group/>
>>>> to be launched by W3C.
>>>>
>>>> No pressure.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Hans
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
>>>> For more information please visithttp://www.symanteccloud.com
>>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2017 10:01:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 9 February 2017 10:01:13 UTC