Re: Schema.org, Enumerations and Wikidata proposal

Denny,

  Dan brings up a good point. We should make sure Wikidata is ok with this.
How do we go about finding out?

guha

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:

> On 11 April 2017 at 19:00, R.V.Guha <guha@guha.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Someone is also bound to mention versioning and whether Wikidata's
> >> type and property names are volatile and whether we should use Q12345
> >> IDs instead; I suggest we defer that conversation for now.
> >>
> >
> > Which is kind of why it would be better to periodically copy over. The
> > stability expectations of wikidata vs schema.org are different.
>
> Perhaps, although we had a similar trajectory to more clearly
> identified snapshots/releases. They might find value in doing this
> too. Or outsourcing that role to schema.org. Worth sync'ing with them
> before writing too much code, at least - there may be variations on
> the idea that will make this effort more useful in the Wikidata
> ecosystem.
>
> Dan
>