All, I have created an issue to continue the discussion, since it seems that a few folks think this can be cleaned up a bit. https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1406 On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:38 PM Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > Vicki, > > Let's keep the discussion here its more open for now. Its a wider view. > I can create a Github issue once we have solidified that this is a begging > issue for most folks. But we need to figure that out here...and why I am > bringing it up for wider discussion beforehand. > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:36 PM Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > > The reason I bring this up is that Schema.org has traditionally avoided > the Commercial / Public overlap when it comes to Properties. You'll only > get a hint of something being of Public or Civic Commericial in nature at > our Type level. This was the case of Museum and many other Types as > well... some Things in this world have a commercial interest and some > Things are governed or administrated by a government authority. We can use > MTE's to handle this gracefully without putting Schema.org Types at > multiple levels in our heirarchy. > > Thad > +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> > >
Received on Sunday, 16 October 2016 17:18:21 UTC