Re: Why is Campground under 2 hierarchy levels ?

All,

I have created an issue to continue the discussion, since it seems that a
few folks think this can be cleaned up a bit.

https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1406


On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:38 PM Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:

> Vicki,
>
> Let's keep the discussion here its more open for now.  Its a wider view.
> I can create a Github issue once we have solidified that this is a begging
> issue for most folks.  But we need to figure that out here...and why I am
> bringing it up for wider discussion beforehand.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:36 PM Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The reason I bring this up is that Schema.org has traditionally avoided
> the Commercial / Public overlap when it comes to Properties.  You'll only
> get a hint of something being of Public or Civic Commericial in nature at
> our Type level.  This was the case of Museum and many other Types as
> well... some Things in this world have a commercial interest and some
> Things are governed or administrated by a government authority.  We can use
> MTE's to handle this gracefully without putting Schema.org Types at
> multiple levels in our heirarchy.
>
> Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>
>

Received on Sunday, 16 October 2016 17:18:21 UTC